Indonesia’s 1997 Bank Closures, the Rp 144.5 Trillion BLBI Scandal, and IBRA

On Saturday, November 1, 1997, Indonesia’s Minister of Finance Mar’ie Muhammad and Bank Indonesia Governor Soedradjad Djiwandono announced the immediate closure and liquidation of 16 insolvent private commercial banks. Designed in consultation with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as a decisive display of reform that would excise weak, politically connected lenders and restore confidence in the tumbling Indonesian rupiah, the measure achieved the exact opposite. Executed in a banking system that possessed no formal deposit insurance scheme and no transparent criteria for which additional banks might be shuttered next, the November 1 closures ignited a nationwide banking panic across Indonesia’s 222 remaining commercial banks. ^[1]

Over the next 18 months, what began as a currency depreciation spiraled into one of the most destructive and fiscally expensive banking collapses in modern history. Trying to keep the payment system alive amid relentless depositor runs, Bank Indonesia pumped Rp 144.5 trillion in emergency central bank liquidity credits—known as Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (BLBI)—into 48 commercial banks, only for Indonesia’s Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) to discover later that more than 95 percent of those funds had been diverted into insider loans, currency speculation, and offshore transfers. By May 1998, as riots toppled President Suharto’s thirty-two-year New Order regime, the newly created Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA, or BPPN) was forced to seize the country’s largest private lender, the Salim Group’s Bank Central Asia (BCA), and recapitalize the shattered banking sector with government bonds exceeding 50 percent of Indonesia’s gross domestic product. ^[2]

Pakto 88 Deregulation and Suharto-Era Crony Banking#

The structural fragility of Indonesia’s banking system traced back to October 1988, when the government enacted the sweeping deregulation package known as Pakto 88. By slashing minimum capital requirements to just Rp 10 billion (roughly $5.8 million at the time) and lifting a seventeen-year moratorium on new banking licenses, Pakto 88 triggered an explosion in private bank charters. Between 1988 and mid-1997, the number of commercial banks operating in Indonesia jumped from 111 to 238—comprising seven giant state-owned banks, 160 private national commercial banks, 27 regional development banks, and 44 foreign and joint-venture banks. ^[3]

In practice, nearly every major Indonesian business conglomerate (konglomerat) and member of President Suharto’s family established or acquired a private bank to act as a captive treasury arm. Mobilizing retail rupiah and dollar deposits by offering high interest rates, these banks funneled loans straight back into their controlling shareholders’ real estate, petrochemical, timber, and infrastructure ventures. Although Bank Indonesia promulgated strict legal lending limits (Batas Maksimum Pemberian Kredit, or BMPK) capping loans to affiliated parties at 20 percent of a bank’s capital, politically protected owners routinely bypassed the cap through dummy companies and cross-lending swaps while central bank examiners were powerless to sanction them. ^[4]

At the same time, Indonesian corporations and banks binged on unhedged short-term US dollar debt, lulled by Bank Indonesia’s predictable crawling-band exchange rate policy, which depreciated the rupiah by roughly 4 to 5 percent per year against the dollar. By June 1997, Indonesian banks held $209 billion in total liabilities, while private corporations owed more than $65 billion in unhedged offshore debt. ^[5]

November 1, 1997: The Closure of 16 Banks and Systemic Contagion#

Following the July 1997 devaluation of the Thai baht, speculative pressure overwhelmed Bank Indonesia’s intervention band. On August 14, 1997, Indonesia abandoned its managed band and floated the rupiah. As domestic corporations scrambled to buy dollars to cover unhedged external debts, the rupiah slid from Rp 2,450 per US dollar in July to over Rp 3,600 in October, while Bank Indonesia temporarily hiked overnight interbank interest rates above 60 percent, strangling bank liquidity. ^[6]

On October 31, 1997, Jakarta signed its first Letter of Intent with the IMF for a $43 billion international rescue package. A centerpiece condition of the agreement was the immediate closure of unviable banks. The very next day, November 1, 1997, the government revoked the operating licenses of 16 insolvent private banks—representing roughly 2.5 percent of total banking sector assets. ^[7]

To demonstrate that presidential cronies were no longer untouchable, the list of 16 shuttered institutions included three banks partly owned by President Suharto’s immediate family: Bank Andromeda (25 percent owned by Suharto’s second son, Bambang Trihatmodjo, alongside tycoon Prajogo Pangestu), Bank Industri (partly owned by Suharto’s daughter Siti Hedijanti “Titiek” Prabowo), and Bank Jakarta (controlled by Suharto’s half-brother Probosutedjo). ^[8]

Three institutional miscalculations turned the November 1 closures into a systemic catastrophe. First, Indonesia possessed no deposit insurance system; authorities announced only an ad-hoc reimbursement up to Rp 20 million (roughly $6,000) per depositor account, leaving corporate treasurers and affluent households completely exposed in any future closure. Second, rumors immediately circulated across Jakarta that the IMF and Bank Indonesia held a secret list of dozens more weak banks slated for a second wave of liquidations. Third, President Suharto publicly undermined his own Finance Minister: furious over the closure of Bank Andromeda, Bambang Trihatmodjo filed a lawsuit against Mar’ie Muhammad and, within two weeks, received permission to purchase another small lender, Bank Alfa, and transfer Bank Andromeda’s branches, staff, and assets straight into the new entity—while Probosutedjo defied the liquidation order and kept Bank Jakarta open.

Seeing that neither property rights nor central bank rules held firm, depositors panicked. Throughout November and December 1997, a massive flight to safety swept Indonesia’s 222 surviving banks. Billions of dollars in deposits poured out of domestic private banks into state-owned banks, foreign bank branches in Jakarta, or offshore accounts in Singapore, paralyzing the domestic interbank market.

The Rp 144.5 Trillion BLBI Central Bank Liquidity Scandal#

As scores of private banks ran out of cash to meet daily clearing obligations at Bank Indonesia, the central bank faced an agonizing dilemma: either reject overdrawn clearing checks and trigger a chain reaction of dozens of unplanned bank closures, or automatically cover the clearing deficits through emergency central bank overdrafts. Directed by President Suharto not to close any more banks, Bank Indonesia chose open-ended liquidity injections.

Under the banner of Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance (Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia, or BLBI), the central bank consolidated multiple emergency overdraft, discount-window, and interbank replacement facilities across late 1997 and 1998. By the time the emergency liquidity spigot was brought under control, Bank Indonesia had disbursed a staggering Rp 144.5 trillion (equivalent to roughly $14 billion to $18 billion during the crisis, or more than 15 percent of Indonesia’s 1998 GDP) to 48 commercial banks.

Instead of stabilizing the currency, unsterilized BLBI money creation fueled a vicious cycle: the rupiah collapsed past Rp 10,000 per dollar in January 1998 and hit nearly Rp 16,500 per dollar in June 1998, while annual inflation surged toward 78 percent. Worse still, bank owners quickly realized that BLBI advances were being disbursed with virtually no collateral verification or on-site supervision.

In August 2000, Indonesia’s Supreme Audit Agency (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, or BPK) released a landmark investigative audit of the Rp 144.5 trillion BLBI program. The BPK concluded that Rp 138.4 trillion—or 95.78 percent of the entire Rp 144.5 trillion disbursed—constituted potential state losses resulting from flagrant regulatory violations, fraud, and misappropriation by both recipient bankers and central bank officials. Rather than using BLBI funds solely to honor retail deposit runs, politically connected tycoons at major recipients—such as Sjamsul Nursalim’s Bank Dagang Nasional Indonesia (BDNI, which absorbed Rp 37 trillion), Bob Hasan and Ongko’s Bank Umum Nasional, and Bank Modern—funneled trillions of rupiah in emergency central bank cash into their own affiliated corporate empires, financed new group investments, transferred capital abroad, and actively speculated against the Indonesian rupiah in the foreign exchange market.

IBRA (BPPN) and the May 1998 Takeover of Bank Central Asia#

By January 1998, with the banking system in freefall, Jakarta and the IMF recognized that ad-hoc closures had failed. On January 26, 1998, President Suharto issued Presidential Decrees No. 26/1998 and No. 27/1998, enacting two emergency pillars: a sweeping government blanket guarantee covering all depositors and non-subordinated creditors of all locally incorporated commercial banks, and the creation of the Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA, known domestically as Badan Penyehatan Perbankan Nasional or BPPN) with extraordinary legal powers to freeze, seize, recapitalize, and liquidate distressed banks and recover BLBI debts.

IBRA’s defining test arrived in May 1998 with the near-collapse of Bank Central Asia (BCA). Founded in 1957 and controlled by billionaire Liem Sioe Liong (Sudono Salim)—head of the Salim Group, Indonesia’s largest corporate conglomerate, and President Suharto’s closest business associate—BCA was the crown jewel of Indonesian private banking, accounting for 12 percent of total national bank deposits with over 800 branches and millions of retail depositors. Crucially, Suharto’s eldest daughter, Siti Hardiyanti “Tutut” Rukmana, and his eldest son, Sigit Harjojudanto, held a combined 30 percent equity stake in BCA alongside the Salim family’s 70 percent share.

During the deadly Jakarta riots of May 13–15, 1998, which targeted ethnic Chinese businesses and forced President Suharto to resign on May 21, mobs burned or looted more than 120 BCA branch offices and destroyed over 1,200 BCA automated teller machines. Terrified depositors—fearing both physical destruction and the political downfall of the Suharto–Salim alliance—queued around the clock to withdraw their savings. Inside two weeks following May 16, 1998, depositors pulled roughly Rp 30 trillion out of BCA, forcing Bank Indonesia to pump approximately Rp 29 trillion to Rp 32 trillion in emergency BLBI liquidity into the bank just to keep its doors open.

On May 28, 1998, one week after Suharto stepped down, IBRA placed Bank Central Asia under state conservatorship (Bank Take Over, or BTO), suspending the voting rights of the Salim family and Suharto’s children and replacing management. Subsequent audits revealed that more than 90 percent of BCA’s massive loan portfolio had been extended to affiliated Salim Group companies—far above the 20 percent legal limit. To avoid criminal prosecution for BMPK violations and settle Rp 52.7 trillion in combined BLBI liquidity debts and intra-group loans, the Salim family signed a Master Settlement and Acquisition Agreement (MSAA) with IBRA in September 1998, surrendering equity stakes in 108 Salim Group corporations (transferred into the IBRA-controlled holding company Holdiko Perkasa) along with nearly all of its remaining shares in BCA.

A 50-Percent-of-GDP Fiscal Reckoning and Reform Legacy#

Between 1998 and its formal dissolution on February 27, 2004, IBRA executed a wholesale reconstruction of Indonesian finance. Out of Indonesia’s 238 pre-crisis banks, more than 65 private banks were permanently closed, 13 major private banks (including BCA, Bank Danamon, Bank Niaga, and Bank Bali) were nationalized or taken over by the state, and four insolvent state-owned giants (Bank Bumi Daya, Bank Dagang Negara, Bank Ekspor Impor Indonesia, and Bapindo) were merged in October 1998 to create the new state flagship, Bank Mandiri.

To replace non-performing loans at BCA and other surviving banks, the Ministry of Finance issued more than Rp 430 trillion in recapitalization bonds alongside Rp 218 trillion in bonds to cover Bank Indonesia’s BLBI losses—a combined sovereign debt issuance of roughly Rp 650 trillion. Even after IBRA recovered roughly 28 percent of face value from auctioning surrendered corporate assets and successfully privatizing a cleaned-up Bank Central Asia (selling a 51 percent controlling stake to a consortium led by U.S. investment firm Farallon Capital in March 2002), economists at the IMF, World Bank, and Australian National University calculated the net fiscal cost of Indonesia’s bank bailout at 50 to 55 percent of annual GDP.

Yet the institutional lessons of November 1997 endured. In May 1999, Indonesia enacted Law No. 23/1999 granting Bank Indonesia statutory independence from presidential interference; in September 2005, Jakarta replaced the emergency 1998 blanket guarantee with the permanent Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan, LPS); and in 2011, authorities created the independent Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, OJK)—ensuring that no Indonesian government would again close banks in a regulatory vacuum or write blank central-bank checks to politically connected tycoons.

Have an idea for another financial history documentary or article? Request a story →